2 people adept in micro physiology that bring attention to the micro physiological effects of the spike protein on the systems of immunology can be found in the their substacks "things hidden in complexity". and "doorlesscarp". they take from studies and build the cases and implications that demonstrate that the spike protein ( both from the infection and from the shots) cause a depression and suppression of the immune system by affecting complex things that up and down regulate immunological pathways of function. I highly recommend these two substances and if you have the time to go back before oct5 and read of what was known or indicated through published research, that are all cited. That those 3 on the podcast would make such assumptive idea around safety for these shots is really quite reckless.
I don’t think it is fair to be bringing weight and attention to studies published after oct 5. However, such studies may indicate that there is likely no studies at the time that support what these people are claiming and so they are only assuming it .
Half way in and I feel disappointed that the three of you could not do a better task of rebutting the statement made from Oct. I assume that you could have had the opportunity to listen to the podcast and take notes and address the points
The toxicity and pathogenicity of the spike protein is likely the most studied and its impact of the spike producing mRNA shots is concealed by the studies claiming study of the virus and suggesting the infection is the main culprit . But because they are specifically studying the effects of the spike protein it can be applied to the shots , that reduce far more for longer periods of time
I believe the issue with igg4 switching is a result where the body is now starting to accept the spike antigen as self Whig puts s as lol those vaccinated in the odd and vulnerable position where they get infected with the virus and don’t attack it with the antibody system
Because it is no longer considered a foreign threat . Which results in longer states of disease and more frequent infections . Which have both been reported . And is what the Cleveland paper demonstrates
Pfizer’s own papers show their own study of nano lipid distribution , which was leaked by Japan and made public in Canada through dr brydle . It was confirmed as the same documents were identified in the foia released Pfizer documents
One of the first issues that was resented to the public was the Salk study that demonstrated that spike protein itself is toxic to the body . I recall it caused quite a stir at the time and the authors had to attempt and attempt to soften the impact . Now , the shots were being printed as better then infection because it produces far more spike protein then the infection does . Which immediately should raise questions considering what the earlier salk study found . Then add the numerous studies that indicate the mRNA produces spike for long periods of time , the shots absolutely
Produce magnitudes more spike protein and this exposure then the live virus ever would .
2 people adept in micro physiology that bring attention to the micro physiological effects of the spike protein on the systems of immunology can be found in the their substacks "things hidden in complexity". and "doorlesscarp". they take from studies and build the cases and implications that demonstrate that the spike protein ( both from the infection and from the shots) cause a depression and suppression of the immune system by affecting complex things that up and down regulate immunological pathways of function. I highly recommend these two substances and if you have the time to go back before oct5 and read of what was known or indicated through published research, that are all cited. That those 3 on the podcast would make such assumptive idea around safety for these shots is really quite reckless.
I don’t think it is fair to be bringing weight and attention to studies published after oct 5. However, such studies may indicate that there is likely no studies at the time that support what these people are claiming and so they are only assuming it .
Half way in and I feel disappointed that the three of you could not do a better task of rebutting the statement made from Oct. I assume that you could have had the opportunity to listen to the podcast and take notes and address the points
The toxicity and pathogenicity of the spike protein is likely the most studied and its impact of the spike producing mRNA shots is concealed by the studies claiming study of the virus and suggesting the infection is the main culprit . But because they are specifically studying the effects of the spike protein it can be applied to the shots , that reduce far more for longer periods of time
I believe the issue with igg4 switching is a result where the body is now starting to accept the spike antigen as self Whig puts s as lol those vaccinated in the odd and vulnerable position where they get infected with the virus and don’t attack it with the antibody system
Because it is no longer considered a foreign threat . Which results in longer states of disease and more frequent infections . Which have both been reported . And is what the Cleveland paper demonstrates
Pfizer’s own papers show their own study of nano lipid distribution , which was leaked by Japan and made public in Canada through dr brydle . It was confirmed as the same documents were identified in the foia released Pfizer documents
One of the first issues that was resented to the public was the Salk study that demonstrated that spike protein itself is toxic to the body . I recall it caused quite a stir at the time and the authors had to attempt and attempt to soften the impact . Now , the shots were being printed as better then infection because it produces far more spike protein then the infection does . Which immediately should raise questions considering what the earlier salk study found . Then add the numerous studies that indicate the mRNA produces spike for long periods of time , the shots absolutely
Produce magnitudes more spike protein and this exposure then the live virus ever would .